What I want to know?
Whichever you prefer when you do train players on tactical games?
Do you prefer to be given to the players a complete plan and the method of complete games or prefer to do exercises on the games by playing position (games plays with two players or three players, for example, scrolling and seizure and cutting its, scroll focal player and work rotation inside and correction,kick-out,roll ,..............)
Also,
What is the content of how to play "the game plan"
Or what are the components of the game plan
that in the tactical side

I have noticed that most of the offense in the European league matches NBA to be that way
Is it better now when training on the offensive instead of the players on the training plan complete

Thanks a lot

I believe I answered this question for you before..... but to simplify the question a little bit... remember, this is just how I prepared my teams.

Ok - here is how I approached games..... ( remember, this is just me )

A) I had 5 items - " What must we do to beat them? "
List all 5 and show the players what we need to do.

B) Another 5 items - " Checklist of things to cover in practice before we play them. "
Then we would work on these things in practice

C & D are more things for the players and coaches to know. and work on.

C) Possible man - man match ups
1- Who is their best shooter
2- Who to foul
3- Who is foul prone

D) What are their Special Plays -- Lobs / staggered screens / back screens etc.