Bobby Knight's Simple Offense Tip On Screens &
Why You May Never Use Down Screens Again

Home > Coaching > Basketball Offense > Bobby Knight's Simple Offense Tip On Screens



When I was watching a basketball game the other night, Bobby Knight talked about screens away from the ball. He mentioned that he did not like screens in which the player receiving the screen moved away from the basket because it was more difficult for the player to be a scoring threat.

An example of this would be the down screen. A player on the wing sets a screen for a player on the block.

If you think about it, the player has to do a full 180 degree turn in order to become a scoring threat. This does a few things:
  1. Less efficient and less accurate shots, because of all of the body movement. It also gives the defender more time to get a hand up to contest the shot. Even at the pro level, a contested shot has much lower percentage than an open shot. Check out these articles for more on that:

    Contesting Shots - Decrease Your Opponent's Shooting Percentage by 25%

    Open Vs. Contested Shots - Sacramention Kings' 2004/2005 Statistics

  2. Offensive player loses offensive advantage to drive to the basket. As mentioned above, this gives more time for the defender to recover which will make it harder for the offensive player to drive by the defender.
Instead, Bobby Knight likes screens where the players going towards the basket. An example of this would be a Away Screen. This is when a player from the high post goes to set a screen for a player in the wing/baseline area. This will accomplish the opposite of the down screen.
  1. More accurate and efficient shots. This will give the player momentum heading to the basket. With this screen, the player can quickly square to the basket and shoot with a higher percentage. Personally, I feel like I develop a better rhythm for the shot when going towards the basket rather than away from the basket.

  2. Offensive player gains offensive advantage to drive to the basket. In order to close out on the shot in time, the defender has run very hard which will often force him to over-pursue and the offensive player can easily fake the shot and drive to the basket.
Now, I'm not against down screens to start a play or get the ball to the wing, but I don't think it is an efficient way to get a shooter a high-percentage scoring opportunity.

If you run a motion offense or a patterned offense that uses lots of down screens, you might want to consider emphasizing and incorporating other types of screens instead.

Personally, after hearing this advice, I will think twice about how I implement a motion offense and what screens I teach/emphasize.

What are your thoughts about this? Let us know by leaving your comments, suggestions, and questions...



Comments

Most Likes First   Oldest First   Newest First

Daniel says:
2/12/2010 at 5:28:05 PM

I would have to agree with coach Knight. We run a motion offense where we start a play with a down screen to the block area... Then a wing Players gets a layup out of it. The player screened is coming up to the top of the 3 point line and does have momentum heading to the basket. With this screen, the player does quickly square to the basket and can shoot with a higher percentage shot.

Like
   

Augie Johnston says:
2/16/2010 at 3:18:45 AM

I agree with the shooting percentage decreasing with downscreens, but I still prefer them for a few reasons. With the second screen you just showed in the video you are getting a catch in a very odd place on the floor and it looks ok in the video, because the other 2 players are not out there. Also, the way you get an open shot with downscreens is usually by fading if the defender goes ball side on the screen. That to is not an easy shot, but does give the shooter plenty of time. Another thing is the screener. With a downscreen you can easily dump the ball to the screener in the post if he opens up right after the screen. I guess if you are running a play that ends with the "New york screen" then I would prefer to have that screen over a down screen, but in every other instance I think I still prefer the downscreen. Just my thoughts...

Like
   

Joe Haefner says:
2/16/2010 at 8:26:49 AM

Good points, Augie. As they say, I guess you need to know the rules before you can break them.

Like
   

Brandon says:
2/16/2010 at 11:49:46 AM

I agree so much with this because it's true. Our Varsity has the hardest time scoring because I think their offenses are not that strong. I always am looking for a way to get my best shooter open because during this generation of players it is guard heavy and necessary to have good guard play. By setting down screens the players back is to the ball. And I feel that it clogs the lane too much. This happens in a 3 out 2 in motion offense. Thats why I run a 4 out 1 in offense and a 1 3 1 offense. To me it gives guards more room to work on a specific side of the floor while there is still action going on the weak side to keep defenders honest.

Like
   

Mike L says:
2/16/2010 at 12:33:58 PM

We are going to use downscreens next season, simply to get the ball in play at the wing. At youth levels, any team that moves is going to get open drives.

Like
   

Andrew Hughes says:
2/16/2010 at 3:32:15 PM

Although I regard Coach Knight as a basketball genius, and own all of his tapes and videos, I would be cautious about following all his suggestions in his new role as a T.V. commentator. Remember that Coach Knight was opposed to on-ball screens as well. Now look at what is back in most offenses.

I also remember his last few years of coaching at Texas Tech, where his motion offense seemed to really struggle at times to get decent shots.

Everything seems to work better if you have great players no matter what you run on offense.

Like
   

Megan Kennedy says:
2/16/2010 at 10:36:48 PM

I can see your (and Coach Knight's point) but the player coming off the screen should be catching the pass mid-turn or on a jump so they land facing the basket. Coming off the down-screen the player should read what their defense is doing and cut accordingly (toward the passer if being chased, away from the passer for a flare-like pass if the defender jumps over the screen, etc). I would also hope most coaches use a combination of down/cross/flare screens throughout their offense.

Like
   

Harold Wimberly says:
2/18/2010 at 12:57:03 PM

I also can see some point to Coach Knight, but I also believe that as a Coach you have to look at the players your getting and review what works for them. Smart players can read how to get open off any screen. So much play can come from the down screen, but again it also depends on your players ability.

Like
   

Coach K junior says:
2/21/2010 at 12:26:08 AM

I only use downscreens to set up spacing for ball reversals to then set up something else. As another option to a downscreen, instead of setting a downscreen, you can set a diagonal backscreen and then pop out with the backscreener. This puts you in the same situation you were in before but gives you an additional backscreen option in the offense.

Just a thought.

Like
   

Simple coach says:
11/2/2011 at 11:33:27 PM

Downscreen are effective for several reasons. It makes the defenders work if set correctly. It sets up possibly a decent shot coming around screen. Plus it adds pressure to defense to communicate. Once you hear "switch", the down screener pins and rolls to receive a hot pass inside for two points.

Downscreens are even more effective when you are able to read the defense. It isnt mandatory you run off the screen to the same spot. Do a curl if the defense is following. Do a flair or skip if defense is riding the top of screen. And even a classic back door is an option if defense is cheating over the screen.

Unfortunately these screening and picking skills are overlooked as important these days. I guarantee my players more points if they do these and they respond to that.

Like
   

Show More















Leave a Comment
Name
:
Email (not published)
:
One times two is equal to?  (Prevents Spam)
Answer
:
 Load New Question
Comments
:
Leave this Blank
: